After the establishment of the machine industry based on
the Industrial
Revolution in the 18th century, production activities
sharply enlarged.
In addition, development of heavy industry and chemical
industry in the
latter half of the 19th century enabled rapid progress of
economical
activities. In the 20th century, technological innovation
progressed with
increasing speed and continued up to the present. During
this passage,
technological development certainly brought the great
benefit to the life of
human. On the contrary, production activities based on
rapid technological
development led to destruction of nature and caused the
problems that put
human being in danger such as destruction of rain forest,
depletion of the
ozone layer, desertification, acid rain, global warming and
environmental
pollution with radioactive wastes, heavy metals and
chemicals. Technologies,
originally developed for bringing human being welfare,
conversely threaten
our life. These ironic phenomena might be said as evils of
the resources
consumption type material civilization based on "mass
production",
"mass consumption" and "mass destruction".
In the end of the 20th century, importance of nature
preservation came
to be recognized. People started to search for methods for
continuous
development and came to advocate the switch from resources
consumption
type society to resources circulation type society.
These trends were proper consequences occurred from the
reflections on
thematerial civilization.
The 21st century will be an important starting point,
which aims at large
conversion from material civilization. Of course, it is not
easy to convert
the economic structure and highly complicated social
structure built
strenuously from the Industrial Revolution. However, now,
we must take
account our situation that we faced with the crisis of the
existence of
ourselves and we are obligated to supply all wisdom to solve
the problems
as the human being who lives in the present age.
If the purpose of economics is "securing the material
foundation of social
life to maintain human life", that of agriculture will be
"investigating the
possibility of the natural resources and developing the
method for practical
use of them to survive". Agriculture is comprehensive
science of the life
system that important mission is obligated. Up to now,
agriculture has
greatly contributed to conquest of starvation and
epidemic. In addition, as
for life science, one of the fields of agriculture, many
results, such as gene
analysis technologies, were obtained. Since agriculture
belongs to the
sciences that studied their subjects from the viewpoints of
life science,
agriculture is more suitable to be called "agricultural life
science".
Agriculture will be expected to bring human being good in
the future and also
have to respond to the expectation.
Thus, although there is no doubt that agricultural life
science is
indispensable to the solution of the critical problem which
human being faces,
it will be necessary to remind following three points
firmly.
First of all, we must clarify our purpose. Recently, we
have many
opportunities to see and hear the words like "earth-saving"
and "kind for
environment". However the purpose of environmental
protection is, without
fearing misunderstanding, not for nature but for survival of
human being,
persistently. This point should be made clear.
Secondly, we must reconfirm that human being is Homo
sapiens. Human
being is simply one of the creatures that survives on the
earth and is
nothing but dominants in the pyramid of biomass. Moreover,
it should keep
in mind that the status of human being will not continue to
be guaranteed
forever.
Finally, we must recognize again the importance of the
fundamental studies.
As mentioned above, modern science enabled gene analysis
and
recombination and made us think that as if human being could
create and
control life. However, how far does we understand life of
the plants that are
the starting points of a food chain and are the only
producers in ecosystem?
In addition, how far can we elucidate the mechanism of the
interaction of the
creatures in ecosystem? It is not too much to say that
human being could
not save nature for the survival of human beings without
these fundamental
knowledge.
If the views mentioned above are shown, the objection will
surely come out.
As for questions of the essence of human being and questions
of the
relationships between human being and nature, there have
been various
philosophical disputes about them from ancient time and,
even now, these
are not questions to be easily concluded. It may be a fact
that human being
is an extraordinary existence on the earth. As Engels
(Friedrich Engels)
pointed out, human being was considered to have evolved by
labor and
language and human being is different existence from the
other creatures in
their performance of production activities. Moreover,
although human being
is one of the members of ecosystem, wastes, human being has
discharged
have been separated from the chain of substance circulation
of ecosystem.
However, justify of nature destruction based on "the man,
the natural
dualism" and "the human original sin theory", human being is
subject to
recognize nature and nature is only object, is not any help
to solve the
problem. However, we do not entirely agree with the
intuitive and mystical
idealism in which man and nature is unit. These topics are
often discussed by
the confrontation diagram of European philosophy and
Oriental philosophy
and there are worthy in comparing and inspection the
differences between
these philosophies. However, in case of thinking about the
relationships
between human being and nature, these discussions rather
cause confusion
than become help. Although it is a fact that the evil of
resources
consumption type civilization caused natural destruction, it
is also a fact that
human being cannot live without using natural
resources. Simultaneously,
human being is required to save nature to continue to
survive in the future.
The point is that the rational limit of the utilization of
natural resources and
nature saving are required to be set up. It is thought that
agricultural life
science is the study that recognizes human being as human
being,
Homo sapiens and the study that plays the role of the
guidance of human
being from the viewpoint of life.
By the way, in case of a discussion about main culprit of
nature destruction,
the population problem is recently referred
frequently. Simultaneously with
it, prospective food problem is also apprehensive
problem. Present world
population, six billion is predicted to increase to 10
billion until 2050.
Malthus (Thomas Robert Malthus) pointed out that "food
productivity did not
increase in form of arithmetic series, although population
increases in form of
geometric progressive" in "An Essay on the Principle of
Population as it
affects the future improvement of society " in 1798.
His opinion seemed to realize through a little more than 200
years.
The problems of starvation and malnutrition have not been
solved yet and,
moreover, increase of world population as predicted will
lead to inevitable
food shortage. There is an opinion that asks agriculture
for the solution of
this problem.
However, the cause of starvation or malnutrition is not
only food shortage
but also the other factors as follows; natural disasters
like drought,
an artificial factor, for example war or dispute and social
factors such as
poverty.
That is the "North-South problem" which Franks (Oliver
Shewell Franks)
pointed out in the middle of the 20th century. Therefore,
agricultural life
science should investigate the possibility of uninvestigated
and unutilized
biological resources in the developing countries and should
contribute to
solve "North-South problem".
In the previous part, we verified the importance of
agricultural life sciences
to solve the critical situation with which human being
faces, the subject that
promotes this promotion must be "citizen". The concept of
the "citizen"
mentioned in this part is "all human existences that are
working with their
independent intention". That is, this concept is not small
cooperation of
industry, academia and government and the conventional
frameworks of
organizations do not have any effects on this concept. When
giving familiar
example, if people participate in the society with their
intention, their social
position, for example civil servant or civilian, will not be
distinguished at all.
Furthermore, from the global field of view, this concept is
the concept that
transcends the distinction between countries and races. In
the confused
present age, we are required to have the consciousness as
"citizen".
Based on the recognition mentioned above, we establish
non-profit
organization, "Supporting Organization for Research of
Agricultural and Life
Science", according to law to Promote Specified Nonprofit
Activities to
promote agricultural life sciences by supporting broad range
of researches
in the field of agricultural life sciences from the point of
view of "citizen"
and, moreover, to contribute human life, welfare and healthy
development.
December 2, 2002
Representative of organizers
When printing the above, PDF file is
here.
|